netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/17] Misc MIPS/BPF fixes for 3.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:12:10 +0100
From:	Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@...tec.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	<ast@...mgrid.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Misc MIPS/BPF fixes for 3.16

On 06/23/2014 08:49 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:38:43 +0100
> 
>> Here are some fixes for MIPS/BPF for 3.16. These fixes make
>> the bpf testsuite *almost* happy with only 2 tests (LD_IND_LL,
>> LD_IND_NET) failing at the moment. Since fixing the remaining tests
>> is not so trivial, it would be nice to have these fixes in 3.16 for now.
>>
>> The patches are based on the upstream-sfr/mips-for-linux-next tree
>> because they depend on https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/7099/
> 
> You did not CC: netdev on patches 1, 2, and 3.  Please do not do this,
> people on this list will want to review the series as a whole.
> 
Apologies David. Patches 1,2,3 have nothing to do with bpf-jit and they
only fix/add MIPS micro-assembler instructions so I didn't though
netdev@ actually cared about that. I will be more careful in the future.

-- 
markos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html