[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140708.205605.1846044536261079477.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 20:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: varkabhadram@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alex.aring@...il.com,
linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, varkab@...c.in
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ieee802154: removed unwanted header files
From: Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:14:04 +0530
> diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_iphc.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_iphc.c
> index 511ddee..d85caa2 100644
> --- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_iphc.c
> +++ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_iphc.c
> @@ -49,12 +49,8 @@
> * SUCH DAMAGE.
> */
>
> -#include <linux/bitops.h>
> -#include <linux/if_arp.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> -#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> #include <net/6lowpan.h>
> -#include <net/ipv6.h>
> #include <net/af_ieee802154.h>
>
These changes are completely bogus.
Where are the definitions of the data types for "struct in6_addr" and
"struct ipv6hdr" coming from.
I'm not even going to look at these patches until you:
1) Properly audit the files. Removing an include and typing "make"
is not auditing the header file requriements. Reading the code
and looking at where declarations and definitions actually come
from _is_.
2) Write a real commit message, this one is way too terse and tells me
nothing. Explain why each header file was removed, and what the
justification is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists