[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1405616424.12363.47.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:00:24 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
stephen hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: print net_device reg_state in
netdev_* unless it's registered
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 16:09 +0200, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> This way we'll always know in what status the device is, unless it's
> running normally (i.e. NETDEV_REGISTERED).
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
[]
> @@ -3388,6 +3388,20 @@ static inline const char *netdev_name(const struct net_device *dev)
> return dev->name;
> }
>
> +static inline const char *netdev_reg_state(const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + switch (dev->reg_state) {
> + case NETREG_UNINITIALIZED: return " (unregistered)";
Why not " (uninitialized)"?
> + case NETREG_REGISTERED: return "";
> + case NETREG_UNREGISTERING: return " (unregistering)";
> + case NETREG_UNREGISTERED: return " (unregistered)";
> + case NETREG_RELEASED: return " (released)";
> + case NETREG_DUMMY: return " (dummy)";
> + }
> +
> + return " (unknown)";
Shouldn't this " (unknown)" have stronger text
and use a WARN_ON_ONCE?
I'd put this in net/core/dev.c and make it not be static inline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists