netdev - Re: mvebu: Can we make the orion-mdio clock a requirement?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:23:26 +0200
From:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: mvebu: Can we make the orion-mdio clock a requirement?

Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:12:45 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:

> > However, yes, I tend to agree, making the clock mandatory would
> > probably be a good thing.
> 
> We can always pass TCLK on Orion5x if there is a need for a mandatory
> clock. Anyway, IIRC clock framework should now properly return
> -EPROPEDEFER only if there is a clock property set. If there is none,
> the error is different and can be catched on Orion5x.

Yes, I already use tclk on Orion5x for various clock references.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html