[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53CE1FB1.6020809@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:54:17 +0530
From: Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, varkabhadram@...il.com
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ethernet: realtek: use module_pci_driver
On 07/22/2014 12:58 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: varkabhadram@...il.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:50:21 +0530
>
>> @@ -1887,11 +1887,7 @@ static int cp_init_one (struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>> resource_size_t pciaddr;
>> unsigned int addr_len, i, pci_using_dac;
>>
>> -#ifndef MODULE
>> - static int version_printed;
>> - if (version_printed++ == 0)
>> - pr_info("%s", version);
>> -#endif
>> + pr_info("%s", version);
> Now you're changing behavior undesirably, it will now print the
> version string into the logs for every instance of the device which is
> discovered.
>
> Seriously, the driver is worse off after these "cleanups".
Here we are having two possibilities here:
1. Removing the version info completely. Ofcourse this is not desirable.
2. Accepting the version info to be print into log messages.
I will put like this by removing #ifdefs:
static int version_printed;
if (version_printed++ == 0)
pr_info("%s", version);
Will it be OK ..?
--
Regards,
Varka Bhadram.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists