netdev - Re: [RFC alternate] ipv6: addrconf: clean up device type handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1406738686.6757.18.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:44:46 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [RFC alternate] ipv6: addrconf: clean up device type handling

On Mi, 2014-07-30 at 18:23 +0200, David Lamparter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Mi, 2014-07-30 at 17:58 +0200, David Lamparter wrote:
> [cut]
> > > This is an alternate version, yanking the switch() down and removing
> > > dev_config/gre_config duplication.  I have no idea what rationale is behind
> > > prefix_route - the result is a fe80::/64 route, but no address, which is not a
> > > functioning configuration.  Jiri, you touched this just a few weeks ago, can
> > > you comment?  (The "XXX: why is GRE special?")
> > 
> > Sure, it is valid. You can still use global addresses to talk to link
> > local addresses on the same link, even from another interface.
> 
> Okay, well, that may give some purpose to it, but doesn't really explain
> why GRE is special in this regard...
> 
> (And it's a violation of RFC4291 section 2.1 - "All interfaces are
> required to have at least one Link-Local unicast address" - and I'd bet
> on ndisc doing weird things in a setup like that.)

Yep - sure. But we also allow someone to remove the ll address manually.
And people did do that to transition the interface into an
disable_ipv6=1 mode, which had its own problems.

We don't care if the user does rfc compliant configurations. :)
The settings in the kernel should just be reasonable.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html