netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: rename __ipv6_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140731.215646.951740411089334213.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: rename __ipv6_addr_jhash()

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:38:18 +0200

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Remove '__' prefix, it has no purpose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Actually, I think it does.

If you look at where this came from, it's commit:

commit b50026b5ac8fe2932e6af0c54b21da0913c4c1c7
Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date:   Sat Oct 19 21:48:52 2013 +0200

    ipv6: split inet6_ehashfn to hash functions per compilation unit

and in that change Hannes uses the convention that __foo() functions
take an initval argument for the hash computation where as foo()
functions do not.

I'm not applying this, sorry :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html