netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sunvnet: ldc_connect() should not return EINVAL when handshake is in progress.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140731.221100.853245332445696300.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Cc:	karl.volz@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sunvnet: ldc_connect() should not return
 EINVAL when handshake is in progress.

From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:31:26 -0400

> 
> The LDC handshake could have been asynchronously triggered
> after ldc_bind() enables the ldc_rx() receive interrupt-handler 
> (and thus intercepts incoming control packets)
> and before vio_port_up() calls ldc_connect(). If that is the case,
> ldc_connect() should return 0 and let the state-machine
> progress.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
> Acked-by: Karl Volz <karl.volz@...cle.com>

This is a sparc architecture change, not a networking one.

Please submit it to the appropriate mailing list, as per the top-level
MAINTAINERS file.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html