lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 21:44:04 +0200 From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>, Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig: Let HISAX_NETJET skip microblaze architecture On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote: >> --- a/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig >> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ config HISAX_MIC >> >> config HISAX_NETJET >> bool "NETjet card" >> - depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))) >> + depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || MICROBLAZE)) >> depends on VIRT_TO_BUS >> help >> This enables HiSax support for the NetJet from Traverse >> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ config HISAX_NETJET >> >> config HISAX_NETJET_U >> bool "NETspider U card" >> - depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))) >> + depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || MICROBLAZE)) >> depends on VIRT_TO_BUS >> help >> This enables HiSax support for the Netspider U interface ISDN card > > Fine with me, however the list is getting long. It would be better if > we could depend on a functional symbol rather than a negated list of > architectures. Would it make sense to have CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN > defined on all little-endian architectures, so that driver can depend > on that if needed? Yes, that idea pops up once in a while. BTW, these days little endian PPC is also supported by Linux... > Alternatively, it might make more sense to list the architectures where > these drivers are actually used in practice. I guess that's X86, maybe > ARM and IA64, and that's all? || COMPILE_TEST .... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists