lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:21:29 +0800 From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> CC: Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig: Let HISAX_NETJET skip microblaze architecture On 08/05/2014 03:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote: >>> --- a/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig >>> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ config HISAX_MIC >>> >>> config HISAX_NETJET >>> bool "NETjet card" >>> - depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))) >>> + depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || MICROBLAZE)) >>> depends on VIRT_TO_BUS >>> help >>> This enables HiSax support for the NetJet from Traverse >>> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ config HISAX_NETJET >>> >>> config HISAX_NETJET_U >>> bool "NETspider U card" >>> - depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))) >>> + depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || MICROBLAZE)) >>> depends on VIRT_TO_BUS >>> help >>> This enables HiSax support for the Netspider U interface ISDN card >> >> Fine with me, however the list is getting long. It would be better if >> we could depend on a functional symbol rather than a negated list of >> architectures. Would it make sense to have CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN >> defined on all little-endian architectures, so that driver can depend >> on that if needed? > > Yes, that idea pops up once in a while. > > BTW, these days little endian PPC is also supported by Linux... > >> Alternatively, it might make more sense to list the architectures where >> these drivers are actually used in practice. I guess that's X86, maybe >> ARM and IA64, and that's all? > > || COMPILE_TEST .... > OK, thanks, what all of you said sounds reasonable to me. Hello Geert: Could you help send the related patch for it? Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists