[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1407306307.14097.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 08:25:07 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] net-timestamp: TCP timestamping
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 22:11 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
...
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
> index 55046ec..f597119 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,21 @@
> #include <net/tcp.h>
> #include <net/protocol.h>
>
> +void tcp_gso_tstamp(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int ts_seq, unsigned int seq,
> + unsigned int mss)
static void ...
Or else :
make C=2 net/ipv4/tcp_offload.o
CHECK net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:17:6: warning: symbol 'tcp_gso_tstamp' was not
declared. Should it be static?
> +{
> + while (skb) {
> + if (ts_seq < (__u64) seq + mss) {
TCP stack uses after() and/or before() macros when dealing with 32bit
sequence numbers.
> + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags = SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP;
> + skb_shinfo(skb)->tskey = ts_seq;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + skb = skb->next;
> + seq += mss;
> + }
> +}
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists