netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/8] staging: et131x: Remove unnecessary i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:06:40 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] staging: et131x: Remove unnecessary i2c_wack variable

Hi Mark,

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Fabio, thanks for the review.
>
> It's a space alignment of parameters to go with the previous change, to
> keep wrapping consistent in the file:
>
> -       while (i2c_wack) {
> +       while (1) {
>                 if (pci_write_config_byte(pdev, LBCIF_CONTROL_REGISTER,
> -                       LBCIF_CONTROL_LBCIF_ENABLE))
> +                                         LBCIF_CONTROL_LBCIF_ENABLE))
>
> So what are you saying - are you just commenting, document it, put it
> in a seperate patch?

Yes, it would be better if this part was part of a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html