[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2515F7E@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 02:38:27 +0000
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 3/4] r8152: remove clear_bp function
Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com]
[...]
> >> Why leave 2 empty lines? One is enough.
>
> > The next patch would use another fucntion at the
> > same location. I skip removing the empty line and
> > re-adding it again. Is that better to do so? I would
> > resend the patches if the answer is yes.
>
> Sorry, I haven't looked at your next patch, too big for me. :-)
It's my mistake. I would avoid it next time. Thanks for your notice.
Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists