netdev - [PATCH net-next] bpf: x86: add missing 'shift by register' instructions to x64 eBPF JIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1408994822-14929-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:27:02 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] bpf: x86: add missing 'shift by register' instructions to x64 eBPF JIT

'shift by register' operations are supported by eBPF interpreter, but were
accidently left out of x64 JIT compiler. Fix it and add a testcase.

Reported-by: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Fixes: 622582786c9e ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT")
---

Probably not worth sending to stable, but wouldn't hurt either.

 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/test_bpf.c              |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 5c8cb8043c5a..b08a98c59530 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -515,6 +515,48 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
 			EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
 			break;
 
+		case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
+
+			/* check for bad case when dst_reg == rcx */
+			if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_4) {
+				/* mov r11, dst_reg */
+				EMIT_mov(AUX_REG, dst_reg);
+				dst_reg = AUX_REG;
+			}
+
+			if (src_reg != BPF_REG_4) { /* common case */
+				EMIT1(0x51); /* push rcx */
+
+				/* mov rcx, src_reg */
+				EMIT_mov(BPF_REG_4, src_reg);
+			}
+
+			/* shl %rax, %cl | shr %rax, %cl | sar %rax, %cl */
+			if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
+				EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
+			else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
+				EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
+
+			switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
+			case BPF_LSH: b3 = 0xE0; break;
+			case BPF_RSH: b3 = 0xE8; break;
+			case BPF_ARSH: b3 = 0xF8; break;
+			}
+			EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg));
+
+			if (src_reg != BPF_REG_4)
+				EMIT1(0x59); /* pop rcx */
+
+			if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_4)
+				/* mov dst_reg, r11 */
+				EMIT_mov(insn->dst_reg, AUX_REG);
+			break;
+
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_BE:
 			switch (imm32) {
 			case 16:
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index 89e0345733bd..8c66c6aace04 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -1342,6 +1342,44 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ { 0, -1 } }
 	},
 	{
+		"INT: shifts by register",
+		.u.insns_int = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R0, -1234),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R1, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_RSH, R0, R1),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R0, 0x7ffffd97, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_LSH, R0, R2),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(R4, -1234),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, R0, R4, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, R4, 63),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_LSH, R0, R4), /* R0 <= 46 */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R3, 47),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ARSH, R0, R3),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R0, -617, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_LSH, R4, R2), /* R4 = 46 << 1 */
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R4, 92, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R4, 4),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_LSH, R4, R4), /* R4 = 4 << 4 */
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R4, 64, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R4, 5),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_LSH, R4, R4), /* R4 = 5 << 5 */
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R4, 160, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(R0, -1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		INTERNAL,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, -1 } }
+	},
+	{
 		"INT: DIV + ABS",
 		.u.insns_int = {
 			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R6, R1),
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html