[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FC2597.4050501@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:13:43 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] ixgbe: support netdev_ops->ndo_xmit_flush()
On 08/26/2014 01:31 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> Jesper, just for fun, could you revert all of the xmit flush stuff and
>> test this patch instead?
>
> This doesn't work properly, sorry. We need to explicitly set xmit_more
> to zero before ->ndo_start_xmit() calls, because the initial zero'ing
> of that value isn't propagated in copy_skb_header() (nor do we want to
> add that).
>
> But I'm beyond convinced now that ->ndo_xmit_flush() is not the way to
> do this.
>
> I'm about to post a set of patches which will go into net-next which:
>
> 1) Converts the tree to skb->xmit_more
>
> 2) Adds Daniel's IXGBE conversion, adjusted for xmit_more.
This seems indeed a better, more lightweight version to accomplish it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists