[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410196297.11872.119.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:11:37 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] skb: Add documentation for skb_clone_sk
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 12:18 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> This change adds some documentation to the call skb_clone_sk. This is
> meant to help clarify the purpose of the function for other developers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index a18dfb0..3f83a8a 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -3511,6 +3511,17 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_dequeue_err_skb(struct sock *sk)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_dequeue_err_skb);
>
> +/**
> + * skb_clone_sk - create clone of skb, and take reference to socket
> + * @skb: the skb to clone
> + *
> + * For functions such as timestamping it is necessary to clone an skb and
> + * hold a reference to the socket for it until the hardware delivers the
> + * actual timestamp or the timestamp is timed out. As as such this
> + * function is useful for creating a clone to later be handed off to
> + * skb_complete_tx_timestamp or kfree_skb to take care of cleaning up
> + * the reference handling for the socket.
> + */
> struct sk_buff *skb_clone_sk(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
Note that I have serious doubts about the atomic_inc_not_zero() here.
At this point, we need to have consistent refcounting on the socket.
If we decide the reference is against sk_refcnt, then current sk_refcnt
cannot be 0 at this point.
This might hide a very serious bug.
In TCP tx path for example, we do not take reference on sk_refcnt for
each packet, but a reference on sk_wmem_alloc
If skb destructor is sock_wfree() or tcp_wfree(), then we should take an
extra reference on sk_wmem_alloc instead of sk_refcnt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists