[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx-BASH-MBwoGUXkvEs0oqfwAsgq6y4YjkksF1qA2ftA+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:32:19 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc: Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] net: Export inet_offloads and inet6_offloads
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>> Want to be able to call this in foo-over-udp offloads, etc.
>>>
>>> In the L2 gro case, we did dedicated helpers
>>> gro_find_receive/complete_by_type, not sure what was
>>> the exact rational there but worth checking, jerry?
>>>
>> It allows offload_base to be kept a static, but then
>> gro_find_receive_by_type can't be inlined.
>
>
> so we have two similar locations in the networking stack acting
> differently on the same/similar simple
> matter... a bit problematic maintainance wise, I would say.
Yes, these should be similar. I think we'd need to cleanup
gro_find_receive_by_type first: export udp_offload base and inline
these functions. Have skb_mac_gso_segment call this also.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists