[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411586550.15395.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:22:30 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/1 V4] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs
with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 11:34 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >
> I believe drivers typically use skb->len for BQL tracking. Since
> bytelimit is based on BQL here, it might be more correct to use
> skb->len.
That is only because drivers dont have access to qdisc_pkt_len(skb) as :
- We can call them without any qdisc traversal
- We escaped from qdisc layer, and gso packet do not have the field set
And drivers actually update BQL inflight, while bulk dequeue do not
update it (its a local copy)
I do not particularly care, as BQL do not have to be 100% precise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists