[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54228F8B.2030804@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:31:55 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 0/5] netns: allow to identify peer netns
Le 23/09/2014 21:26, Andy Lutomirski a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
> <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
>> The goal of this serie is to be able to multicast netlink messages with an
>> attribute that identify a peer netns.
>> This is needed by the userland to interpret some informations contained in
>> netlink messages (like IFLA_LINK value, but also some other attributes in case
>> of x-netns netdevice (see also
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/315933/focus=316064 and
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/28301/focus=4239)).
>>
>> Ids are stored in the parent user namespace. These ids are valid only inside
>> this user namespace. The user can retrieve these ids via a new netlink messages,
>> but only if peer netns are in the same user namespace.
>
> What about the parent / ancestors of the owning userns? Can processes
> in those usernses see any form of netns id?
With this serie no. I'm not sure if ancestors really needs to be able to
get these ids. What is your opinion?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists