[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411930364.15768.80.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:52:44 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: optimize xmit path
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 11:07 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> this is great improvement!
> Thank you for leading this effort.
> 10G line rate is definitely nice :)
> Hopefully Or can demo similar numbers with 40G nic as well :)
>
> > + if (ring->bf_enabled && desc_size <= MAX_BF && !bounce &&
> > + !vlan_tx_tag_present(skb) && send_doorbell) {
>
> feels something wrong here, since it checks for
> send_doorbell, but iowrite() happens in the 'else' part
> of this branch with another 'if (send_doorbell)'
>
If we do not plan to send a doorbell, we should not use blueframe.
Blueframe is always sending a doorbell by design, as it uses a single
flip buffer.
So if you want to see any improvement thanks to skb->xmit_more, we have
to use the iowrite32(), not the blueframe.
Therefore , if send_doorbell == false, we do not want the doorbell
Is it making sense now ? ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists