[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1412040618.30721.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:30:18 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: cleanup and document skb fclone layout
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:29 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> struct sk_buff *skb_clone(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - struct sk_buff *n;
> + struct sk_buff_fclones *fclones = container_of(skb,
> + struct sk_buff_fclones,
> + skb1);
> + struct sk_buff *n = &fclones->skb2;
>
> if (skb_orphan_frags(skb, gfp_mask))
> return NULL;
>
> - n = skb + 1;
> if (skb->fclone == SKB_FCLONE_ORIG &&
> n->fclone == SKB_FCLONE_UNAVAILABLE) {
> - atomic_t *fclone_ref = (atomic_t *) (n + 1);
> n->fclone = SKB_FCLONE_CLONE;
> - atomic_inc(fclone_ref);
> + atomic_inc(&fclones->fclone_ref);
> } else {
> if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
> gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
Note :
The "atomic_inc(&fclones->fclone_ref)" here can be replaced by an
atomic_set(&fclones->fclone_ref, 2), to avoid a locked operation.
I'll cook a patch for this, after you merged this cleanup
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists