[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141007.131938.1410434352331637585.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:19:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: hannes@...essinduktion.org, brouer@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com, fw@...len.de,
dborkman@...hat.com, jhs@...atatu.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, dave.taht@...il.com, toke@...e.dk
Subject: Re: Quota in __qdisc_run()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:01:20 -0700
> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 16:43 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
>> This needs to be:
>>
>> do
>> ...
>> while ((iskb = iskb->next))
>
> I do not feel needed to break the bulk dequeue at precise quota
> boundary. These quotas are advisory, and bql prefers to get its full
> budget for appropriate feedback from TX completion.
>
> Quota was a packet quota, which was quite irrelevant if segmentation had
> to be done, so I would just let the dequeue be done so that we benefit
> from optimal xmit_more.
Yes, this makes sense, do a full qdisc_restart() cycle without boundaries,
then check how much quota was used afterwards to guard the outermost loop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists