[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141014.171652.711587177378371980.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:16:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: TCP Small Queues and strange attractors
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:10:18 -0700
> On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 15:33 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 06:27:47 -0700
>>
>> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> > index 8d4eac793700..4a7e97811d71 100644
>> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> > @@ -839,26 +839,38 @@ void tcp_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> > {
>> ...
>> > local_irq_restore(flags);
>> > - } else {
>> > - sock_wfree(skb);
>> > + return;
>> > }
>> > +out:
>> > + sk_free(sk);
>> > }
>> >
>>
>> Why do we need to release the socket here?
>
> Thats because we had to keep a reference at the very beginning :
>
> + /* Keep one reference on sk_wmem_alloc.
> + * Will be released by sk_free() from here or tcp_tasklet_func()
> + */
> + wmem = atomic_sub_return(skb->truesize - 1, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
> +
>
>
> If we find that we do not arm the tasklet (and keep the reference), we
> then can remove the last ref we kept.
>
> sk_free() is essentially doing :
>
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc))
> __sk_free(sk)
Gotcha, now it makes sense.
Patch applied, thanks Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists