[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1413321018.17109.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:10:18 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: TCP Small Queues and strange attractors
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 15:33 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 06:27:47 -0700
>
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> > index 8d4eac793700..4a7e97811d71 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> > @@ -839,26 +839,38 @@ void tcp_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> ...
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > - } else {
> > - sock_wfree(skb);
> > + return;
> > }
> > +out:
> > + sk_free(sk);
> > }
> >
>
> Why do we need to release the socket here?
Thats because we had to keep a reference at the very beginning :
+ /* Keep one reference on sk_wmem_alloc.
+ * Will be released by sk_free() from here or tcp_tasklet_func()
+ */
+ wmem = atomic_sub_return(skb->truesize - 1, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
+
If we find that we do not arm the tasklet (and keep the reference), we
then can remove the last ref we kept.
sk_free() is essentially doing :
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc))
__sk_free(sk)
sock_wfree() is the same, its only that we know that TCP socket do not
pass this test :
if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_USE_WRITE_QUEUE)) {
sk->sk_write_space(sk);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists