netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: introduce tcp_v6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1413569996.25949.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:19:56 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: introduce tcp_v6_iif()

On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 09:58 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:

> I doubt we still need to store iif in IP6CB() since we have skb->skb_iif,
> we can probably just make inet6_iif() be like inet_iif() so that IP6CB()->iif
> can be just removed? Does this make any sense to you?
> 

This makes sense and would gain 4 bytes in skb->cb[], so definitely
worth it.

> (I have a patch locally since I thought it should be target for net-next.)
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html