[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7O0tUinJV4mMOWKF0A6pR3HQL1HA2Zurs=EPDu6suUZGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:26:15 -0700
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Krzysztof Kolasa <kkolasa@...soft.pl>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv4: clear all TCP_SKB_CB before passing to network layer
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 10:49 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
>>
>> Probably not a big deal, but IP is not the only network protocol,
>> don't clear skb->cb just for IP.
>>
>> Also, IPv6 header is not always defined in struct tcp_skb_cb.
>>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kolasa <kkolasa@...soft.pl>
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> index e13d778..ee356e5 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> @@ -1005,9 +1005,7 @@ static int tcp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int clone_it,
>> /* Our usage of tstamp should remain private */
>> skb->tstamp.tv64 = 0;
>>
>> - /* Cleanup our debris for IP stacks */
>> - memset(skb->cb, 0, max(sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm),
>> - sizeof(struct inet6_skb_parm)));
>> + memset(TCP_SKB_CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*TCP_SKB_CB(skb)));
>>
>> err = icsk->icsk_af_ops->queue_xmit(sk, skb, &inet->cork.fl);
>>
>
>
> Usually, each layer is responsible for clearing skb->cb[] at its entry
> point. Or more exactly it does not care of previous garbage.
>
> There is no evidence your patch is needed.
This is why I said "probably not a big deal" in changelog, I never
say it fixes anything, just a cleanup.
>
> I was maybe too defensive when I added this, because I wanted to make
> only TCP changes.
>
> We should instead remove the memset() in TCP and fix IP/IPv6 if
> necessary.
That works too and sounds better.
>
> But this should wait net-next being open.
>
>
Yeah, agreed, I will update and resend when net-next is reopen.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists