netdev - Re: irq disable in __netdev_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <544873DF.1040403@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:19:59 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: irq disable in __netdev_alloc_frag() ?

On 10/22/2014 06:52 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 17:15 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> in the commit 6f532612cc24 ("net: introduce netdev_alloc_frag()")
>> you mentioned that the reason to disable interrupts
>> in __netdev_alloc_frag() is:
>> "- Must be IRQ safe (non NAPI drivers can use it)"
>>
>> Is there a way to do this conditionally?
>>
>> Without it I see 10% performance gain for my RX tests
>> (from 6.9Mpps to 7.7Mpps) and __netdev_alloc_frag()
>> itself goes from 6.6% to 2.1%
>> (popf seems to be quite costly)
> Well, your driver is probably a NAPI one, so you need to
> mask irqs, or to remove all non NAPI drivers from linux.
>
> __netdev_alloc_frag() (__netdev_alloc_skb()) is used by all.
>
> Problem is __netdev_alloc_frag() is generally deep inside caller
> chain, so using a private pool might have quite an overhead.
>
> Same could be said for skb_queue_head() /skb_queue_tail() /
> sock_queue_rcv_skb() :
> Many callers don't need to block irq.

Couldn't __netdev_alloc_frag() be forked into two functions, one that is
only called from inside the NAPI context and one that is called for all
other contexts?  It would mean having to double the number of pages
being held per CPU, but I would think something like that would be doable.

Thanks,

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html