netdev - Re: [PATCH] fixup! net: pxa168_eth: Provide phy_interface mode on platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5450066D.2010600@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:11:09 +0100
From:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	eric.y.miao@...il.com, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixup! net: pxa168_eth: Provide phy_interface mode on
 platform_data

On 28.10.2014 21:49, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:08:59 +0200
>
>> Do not add phy include to the board file but platform_data include
>> instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
>> ---
>> David,
>>
>> I should have compile tested this patch earlier. I did now on
>> pxa168_defconfig right after I received an 0-day kbuild error
>> on this patch.
>>
>> This is the corresponding fix, can you please squash it in?
>>
>> Thanks and sorry for the noise,
>
> Patch applied to net-next, but:
>
> 1) There is never any way for me to "squash" a patch into an old
>     one.  Once I apply a patch it is a permanent commit in my tree
>     and cannot be undone and/or modified.
>
>     Therefore the only thing you can do is send me a relative fix
>     and that's what shows up in my tree as yet another later commit.

Ok, good to know and sorry for the crippled fixup patch. I was assuming
that net-next is also rebased until pulled/moved to some stable state.

> 2) Always be specific about the target tree in you subject,
>     line.  Never assume I can figure it out by context.

Also, sorry for the little information given.

Thanks,

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html