[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAedzxoKWVpu67vycM_b0O5bA7mpWP=PGvj_ENbZZEVFpoMGqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:59:06 +0900
From: Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: Add a sysctl to make optimistic
addresses useful candidates
>> * Configure the address for reception. Now it is valid.
>> */
>>
>> - ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_NEWADDR, ifp);
>> + /* If optimistic DAD is in use, the notification was already sent
>> + * in addrconf_dad_begin().
>> + */
>> + if (!ipv6_use_optimistic_addr(ifp->idev))
>> + ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_NEWADDR, ifp);
>
> Won't this result in not sending RTM_NEWADDR messages if
> use_optimistic is enabled on the interface, but the IP address that
> has just completed DAD is not an optimistic address (e.g., if it's a
> manually-configured address)?
Gah, yes. I originally unconditionally sent the RTM_NEWADDR, but
there was some concern about sending duplicates so this was a weak
attempt to reduce spurious messages.
I still think sending the RTM_NEWADDR unconditionally is the right
thing, since we send them all the time when something about the
address changes (including timer-refresh on receipt of RAs).
I'll revert that bit and send an updated patch ASAP.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists