netdev - Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] net: allow setting ecn via routing table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1414703260.15352.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:07:40 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] net: allow setting ecn via routing table

On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 21:52 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:

> So, what about changing the default to 1 in net-next?
> 
> We could add automatic 'no-ecn' to retransmitted syns to avoid
> ecn blackholes (Daniel Borkmann has a patch for this), and, in case
> ecn=1 causes too much breakage we can always revert (and re-consider ecn
> per route settings as an intermediate step).
> 
> What do you think?

I think this is way too dangerous.

I played a lot with ECN in the past (and fixed number of bugs in linux)
and discovered many times I had to disable it to be able to surf the
Internet.

I am kind of an expert so always could figure out what was the problem,
but average user wont have the choice.

Reverting might take a long long time, it wont help people stuck behind
buggy equipment.





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html