netdev - drivers: net: cpsw: Fix broken loop condition in switch mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141031172854.GJ24110@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:28:54 -0400
From:	"Lennart Sorensen" <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>,
	Len Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: drivers: net: cpsw: Fix broken loop condition in switch mode

0d961b3b52f566f823070ce2366511a7f64b928c (drivers: net: cpsw: fix buggy
loop condition) accidentally fixed a loop comparison in too many places
while fixing a real bug.

It was correct to fix the dual_emac mode section since there 'i' is used
as an index into priv->slaves which is a 0 based array.

However the other two changes (which are only used in switch mode)
are wrong since there 'i' is actually the ALE port number, and port 0
is the host port, while port 1 and up are the slave ports.

Putting the loop condition back in the switch mode section fixes it.

A comment has been added to point out the intent clearly to avoid future
confusion.  Also a comment is fixed that said the opposite of what was
actually happening.

Signed-off-by: Len Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 952e1e4..4683196 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
 		if (enable) {
 			unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ;
 
-			/* Disable Learn for all ports */
-			for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) {
+			/* Disable Learn for all ports (host is port 0 and slaves are port 1 and up */
+			for (i = 0; i <= priv->data.slaves; i++) {
 				cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,
 						     ALE_PORT_NOLEARN, 1);
 				cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,
@@ -616,11 +616,11 @@ static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
 			cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, 0, ALE_P0_UNI_FLOOD, 1);
 			dev_dbg(&ndev->dev, "promiscuity enabled\n");
 		} else {
-			/* Flood All Unicast Packets to Host port */
+			/* Don't Flood All Unicast Packets to Host port */
 			cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, 0, ALE_P0_UNI_FLOOD, 0);
 
-			/* Enable Learn for all ports */
-			for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) {
+			/* Enable Learn for all ports (host is port 0 and slaves are port 1 and up */
+			for (i = 0; i <= priv->data.slaves; i++) {
 				cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,
 						     ALE_PORT_NOLEARN, 0);
 				cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,

-- 
Len Sorensen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html