lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 17:08:12 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: ebiederm@...ssion.com Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...capital.net, cwang@...pensource.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] netns: allow to identify peer netns From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:41:03 -0700 > Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> writes: > >> The goal of this serie is to be able to multicast netlink messages with an >> attribute that identify a peer netns. >> This is needed by the userland to interpret some informations contained in >> netlink messages (like IFLA_LINK value, but also some other attributes in case >> of x-netns netdevice (see also >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/315933/focus=316064 and >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/28301/focus=4239)). >> >> Ids of peer netns are set by userland via a new genl messages. These ids are >> stored per netns and are local (ie only valid in the netns where they are set). >> To avoid allocating an int for each peer netns, I use idr_for_each() to retrieve >> the id of a peer netns. Note that it will be possible to add a table (struct net >> -> id) later to optimize this lookup if needed. >> >> Patch 1/4 introduces the netlink API mechanism to set and get these ids. >> Patch 2/4 and 3/4 implements an example of how to use these ids in rtnetlink >> messages. And patch 4/4 shows that the netlink messages can be symetric between >> a GET and a SET. >> >> iproute2 patches are available, I can send them on demand. > > A quick reply. I think this patchset is in the right general direction. > There are some oddball details that seem odd/awkward to me such as using > genetlink instead of rtnetlink to get and set the ids, and not having > ids if they are not set (that feels like a maintenance/usability challenge). > > I would like to give your patches a deep review, but I won't be able to > do that for a couple of weeks. I am deep in the process of moving, > and will be mostly offline until about the Nov 11th. I'm going to mark this patch set 'deferred' in patchwork until things move forward. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists