[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141103.151248.1183539988304355806.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:12:48 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: therbert@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/7] gue: Add infrastructure for flags and
options
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:39:14 -0800
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:18 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
>> Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 15:57:59 -0700
>>
>>> @@ -20,7 +20,16 @@ static size_t fou_encap_hlen(struct ip_tunnel_encap *e)
>>>
>>> static size_t gue_encap_hlen(struct ip_tunnel_encap *e)
>>> {
>>> - return sizeof(struct udphdr) + sizeof(struct guehdr);
>>> + size_t len;
>>> + bool need_priv = false;
>>> +
>>> + len = sizeof(struct udphdr) + sizeof(struct guehdr);
>>> +
>>> + /* Add in lengths flags */
>>> +
>>> + len += need_priv ? GUE_LEN_PRIV : 0;
>>
>> Add this need_priv logic in patch #6, not here.
>
> I would rather keep it in this patch. This is adding the common
> infrastructure to support private option field, remote checksum
> offload is an instance that uses that.
Tom, it evaluates always to a constant boolean, and contextually makes
no sense to someone reviewing this change in isolation.
Please, as I have asked, put this in the patch where the logic
actually matters.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists