netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] vxlan: Do not reuse sockets for a different address family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:59:13 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mleitner@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] vxlan: Do not reuse sockets for a different
 address family

From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2014 15:03:20 -0200

> @@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ static struct vxlan_sock *vxlan_find_sock(struct net *net, __be16 port)
>  	struct vxlan_sock *vs;
>  
>  	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(vs, vs_head(net, port), hlist) {
> -		if (inet_sk(vs->sock->sk)->inet_sport == port)
> +		if (inet_sk(vs->sock->sk)->inet_sport == port &&
> +		    inet_sk(vs->sock->sk)->sk.sk_family == family)

You didn't even compile this.

You're in the penalty box, and I'm ignoring your patches for at least
a week, this is really unacceptable for an upstream patch submission.

Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html