[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545A96C4.3030106@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:29:40 -0200
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] vxlan: Do not reuse sockets for a different address
family
On 05-11-2014 18:59, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:03:20 -0200
>
>> @@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ static struct vxlan_sock *vxlan_find_sock(struct net *net, __be16 port)
>> struct vxlan_sock *vs;
>>
>> hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(vs, vs_head(net, port), hlist) {
>> - if (inet_sk(vs->sock->sk)->inet_sport == port)
>> + if (inet_sk(vs->sock->sk)->inet_sport == port &&
>> + inet_sk(vs->sock->sk)->sk.sk_family == family)
>
> You didn't even compile this.
This patch was part of a bigger change and I really thought I had tested it by
itself, but clearly I was wrong, sorry.
(I changed the port hash to include the family in the key, and that's how that
variable got there.)
> You're in the penalty box, and I'm ignoring your patches for at least
> a week, this is really unacceptable for an upstream patch submission.
>
> Sorry.
Ack, sorry again. It was twice in a bad day, but my bad. Won't happen again.
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists