[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415150445.1458.1.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:20:45 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] tcp: zero retrans_stamp if all retrans were acked
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 18:51 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> And thank you guys for all the assistance on it. Btw, would you send me that
> packetdrill script? I'm curious to see how such corner case could be written
> on it.
One of the script I saw was :
You might have to adapt preconditions (tcp_rmem[]/tcp_wmem[])
0.000 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
// Set a 10s timeout
+.000 setsockopt(3, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [10000], 4) = 0
+.000 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+.000 listen(3, 1) = 0
+.000 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 7>
+.000 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 6>
+.010 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 257
+.000 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+.000 write(4, ..., 1000) = 1000
+.000 > P. 1:1001(1000) ack 1
+.625 > P. 1:1001(1000) ack 1
+.020 < . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 257
// Purposely write more after the specified timeout for testing
+11.0 write(4, ..., 1000) = 1000
+.000 > P. 1001:2001(1000) ack 1
+1.25 > P. 1001:2001(1000) ack 1
// socket is killed when the 2nd RTO fires at +2.50 w/o this patch
// so the next write returns ETIMEOUT
+2.60 write(4, ..., 1000) = 1000
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists