[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXZBz=Ha2h3mCwnZKa3Etx7Ya9NxAWe_p8T+VjRUs5g0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 17:25:31 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] net_sched: misc cleanups and improvements
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> If you do not care of writing good changelogs and explain why you want
> all this, why should I care spending time to review all this stuff ?
>
> What is the plan, beyond all this code churn ?
Why $subject isn't obvious?
I don't understand why you are only mean to me (and probably David Taht too).
Sit down and search the history, you will find:
commit c6be2a10ac2f810bdd01e978c93a8ef65b46120b
Merge: 7fd2561 44cc8ed
Author: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed Oct 29 15:59:43 2014 -0400
Merge branch 'xen-netback-next'
David Vrabel says:
====================
xen-netback: minor cleanups
Two minor xen-netback cleanups originally from Zoltan.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Tell me, why this changelog in anyway could be better than me? which
was accepted (of course not by you). You can argue I have 13 patches,
but, there is no big difference between 13 cleanup's and 2 cleanup's,
cleanup's are cleanup's, that's it.
Seriously, think about why it should when it's just cleanup's, be practical.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists