[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416236150.5102.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:55:50 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Serey Kong <serey.kong@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"jogreene@...hat.com" <jogreene@...hat.com>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 03/12] i40e: Handle a single mss packet with more
than 8 frags
On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 14:40 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Not that one.
> IIRC is was done to reduce the number of fragments through xennet.
>
> You really want to try to keep some of the old fragments, just adding
> new ones to merge short sections.
>
> OTOH 8 fragments isn't enough if the MAC supports TSO (dunno if it does).
I40 is a 40Gb NIC, it supports TSO, obviously.
> The skb_linearize() is only likely to fail for TSO anyway.
> Or rather, if it can't allocate a 4k page you are already stuffed.
So far, nobody wrote the code for this.
Page frag are allocated from pages, so if you cannot allocate a 4k page,
this function has no guarantee to succeed no matter how hard you tried.
alloc_skb_with_frags() was already _much_ better than a single
allocation of order-5 page. But if you feel you can do better, why don't
you provide the code ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists