[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7MnLy=8uL_hSnx=BN2QTs2kvempTxtmSO6hjcS+E0yRwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:29:15 -0800
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, dgibson@...hat.com,
vfalico@...il.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>,
wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com.pnq.redhat.com,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
xii@...gle.com, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: allow large number of rx queues
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> As vmalloc() adds overhead on a critical network path,
> __GFP_REPEAT flag is used with kzalloc() to do this fallback
> only when really needed.
>
Are you sure we need __GFP_REPEAT? We have vmalloc() as
fallback of kmalloc() in many places of networking (grep kvfree),
none of those I checked has this flag set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists