[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546BAB93.4010406@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:26:59 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net: sched: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the
function call "kfree"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:21:16 +0100
The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
index 0e30d58..f323944 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
@@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ static int cls_bpf_modify_existing(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
if (fp_old)
bpf_prog_destroy(fp_old);
- if (bpf_old)
- kfree(bpf_old);
+ kfree(bpf_old);
return 0;
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists