[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546CC9B3.5060405@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:47:47 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: sched: Deletion of an unnecessary check before
the function call "kfree"
On 11/18/2014 12:26 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:21:16 +0100
>
> The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
> index 0e30d58..f323944 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ static int cls_bpf_modify_existing(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
>
> if (fp_old)
> bpf_prog_destroy(fp_old);
> - if (bpf_old)
> - kfree(bpf_old);
> + kfree(bpf_old);
>
> return 0;
>
>
Maybe I need some coffee but I can't figure out what this
patch is against...
# grep bpf_old ./net/sched/cls_bpf.c
#
Marcus, what tree are you looking at?
--
John Fastabend Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists