[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416957328.5089.17.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:15:28 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
peterz@...radead.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org,
mikey@...ling.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, matthew.vick@...el.com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
romieu@...zoreil.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com, will.deacon@....com, michael@...erman.id.au,
tony.luck@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] arch: Add lightweight memory barriers dma_rmb()
and dma_wmb()
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:24 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> There are a number of situations where the mandatory barriers rmb() and
> wmb() are used to order memory/memory operations in the device drivers
> and those barriers are much heavier than they actually need to be. For
> example in the case of PowerPC wmb() calls the heavy-weight sync
> instruction when for coherent memory operations all that is really needed
> is an lsync or eieio instruction.
> .../...
For powerpc:
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists