netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5 net] bridge: Fix missing Netlink message validations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54760D1D.3070201@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:25:49 -0800
From:	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, davem@...emloft.net,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 net] bridge: Fix missing Netlink message validations

On 11/26/2014 09:06 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 11/26/14 at 08:58am, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 11/26/2014 04:42 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
>>> Adds various missing length checks in the bridging code for Netlink
>>> messages and corresponding attributes provided by user space.
>>>
>>> Thomas Graf (5):
>>>    bridge: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute length
>>>    net: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE attribute length
>>>    net: Check for presence of IFLA_AF_SPEC
>>>    bridge: Add missing policy entry for IFLA_BRPORT_FAST_LEAVE
>>>    bridge: Sanitize IFLA_EXT_MASK for AF_BRIDGE:RTM_GETLINK
>>>
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c   |  5 +++++
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c |  5 +++++
>>>   net/bridge/br_netlink.c                       |  1 +
>>>   net/core/rtnetlink.c                          | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>   4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> +Jiri
>>
>> Looks like a miss in bond_netlink also? Seems like writing
>> a smatch or cocci check for this would be worthwhile.
>
> Thanks, I'll take a look.
>
> The cocci check is somewhat difficult as validation is often
> centralized and decoupled from actual access to implement atomic
> operations. I'll give it a try though.
>

Sounds good, if I get some time I could give it a try as well.

Also another missing one here or at least I'm not seeing it if its
there,

> --- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> @@ -1687,8 +1687,11 @@ static int inet_set_link_af(struct net_device *dev, const struct nlattr *nla)
>                 BUG();
>
>         if (tb[IFLA_INET_CONF]) {
> -               nla_for_each_nested(a, tb[IFLA_INET_CONF], rem)
> +               nla_for_each_nested(a, tb[IFLA_INET_CONF], rem) {
> +                       if (nla_len(a) < sizeof(u32))
> +                               return -EINVAL;
>                         ipv4_devconf_set(in_dev, nla_type(a), nla_get_u32(a));
> +               }
>         }





-- 
John Fastabend         Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html