[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126170610.GA2399@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:06:10 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, davem@...emloft.net,
stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 net] bridge: Fix missing Netlink message validations
On 11/26/14 at 08:58am, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 04:42 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >Adds various missing length checks in the bridging code for Netlink
> >messages and corresponding attributes provided by user space.
> >
> >Thomas Graf (5):
> > bridge: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute length
> > net: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE attribute length
> > net: Check for presence of IFLA_AF_SPEC
> > bridge: Add missing policy entry for IFLA_BRPORT_FAST_LEAVE
> > bridge: Sanitize IFLA_EXT_MASK for AF_BRIDGE:RTM_GETLINK
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c | 5 +++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 5 +++++
> > net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 1 +
> > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> +Jiri
>
> Looks like a miss in bond_netlink also? Seems like writing
> a smatch or cocci check for this would be worthwhile.
Thanks, I'll take a look.
The cocci check is somewhat difficult as validation is often
centralized and decoupled from actual access to implement atomic
operations. I'll give it a try though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists