[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126092512.GE1875@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:25:12 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, dborkman@...hat.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com, azhou@...ira.com,
ben@...adent.org.uk, stephen@...workplumber.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, jhs@...atatu.com, sfeldma@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
linville@...driver.com, jasowang@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
mleitner@...hat.com, shrijeet@...il.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
bcrl@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 16/17] bridge: add brport flags to dflt
bridge_getlink
Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:07:53PM CET, tgraf@...g.ch wrote:
>On 11/25/14 at 11:28am, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>>
>> To allow brport device to return current brport flags set on port. Add
>> returned flags to nested IFLA_PROTINFO netlink msg built in dflt getlink.
>> With this change, netlink msg returned for bridge_getlink contains the port's
>> offloaded flag settings (the port's SELF settings).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>
>Minor nit below. Otherwise:
>
>Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
>
>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> index bd5e783..91e5368 100644
>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> @@ -2687,12 +2687,22 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> return skb->len;
>> }
>>
>> +static int brport_nla_put_flag(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 flags, u32 mask,
>> + unsigned int attrnum, unsigned int flag)
>> +{
>> + if (mask & flag)
>> + return nla_put_u8(skb, attrnum, !!(flags & flag));
>
>nla_put_flag()?
No, that is not the same. nla_put_flag works differently. The attr is
either present or not. But in this case, attr is always present and has
value of either 0 or 1.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists