[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126102648.GG1875@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:26:48 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"dborkman@...hat.com" <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"jesse@...ira.com" <jesse@...ira.com>,
"pshelar@...ira.com" <pshelar@...ira.com>,
"azhou@...ira.com" <azhou@...ira.com>,
"ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"vyasevic@...hat.com" <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"Fastabend, John R" <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
"ryazanov.s.a@...il.com" <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
"buytenh@...tstofly.org" <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Aviad Raveh <aviadr@...lanox.com>,
"nbd@...nwrt.org" <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Neil Jerram <Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com>,
"ronye@...lanox.com" <ronye@...lanox.com>,
"simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
"alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com" <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"mleitner@...hat.com" <mleitner@...hat.com>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 09/17] bridge: add API to notify bridge
driver of learned FBD on offloaded device
Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 02:48:04AM CET, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
>> On 11/25/14 at 11:38am, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:28:40AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> > From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>>> >
>>> > When the swdev device learns a new mac/vlan on a port, it sends some async
>>> > notification to the driver and the driver installs an FDB in the device.
>>> > To give a holistic system view, the learned mac/vlan should be reflected
>>> > in the bridge's FBD table, so the user, using normal iproute2 cmds, can view
>>> > what is currently learned by the device. This API on the bridge driver gives
>>> > a way for the swdev driver to install an FBD entry in the bridge FBD table.
>>> > (And remove one).
>>> >
>>> > This is equivalent to the device running these cmds:
>>> >
>>> > bridge fdb [add|del] <mac> dev <dev> vid <vlan id> master
>>> >
>>> > This patch needs some extra eyeballs for review, in paricular around the
>>> > locking and contexts.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>>
>> I like the simplicity of this. That said, given we'll have multiple
>> users of swdev including OVS, shouldn't this be a notifier or a
>> callback that depends on who is controlling the device?
>
>I like the idea. When the switch port joins Linux bridge or OVS
>datapath, a callback is registered with the driver. That way the
>driver doesn't really care if the port is a bridge member or an OVS
>vport in a datapath. It's just passing up the FDB entry
>(port/mac/vlan) details to the container device. Can we hold this
>idea until this patchset sticks? I think once OVS support comes back
>into the swdev model would be the time to address this.
Yep, I agree this is a good idea and I also vote for implemeting this as
a follow-up. Thanks.
>
>>
>>> > + spin_lock(&br->hash_lock);
>>> (Since you asked to check locking...)
>>>
>>> Most of the other fdb_add/delete/insert/update calls take this with
>>> spin_lock_bh. Did you try this with lockdep enabled just to see if that
>>> is needed here? I suspect that anytime br->hash_lock is taken it will
>>> need to be with softirqs disabled from this point forward.
>>
>> At least br_fdb_update() seems to be called from BH context so I would
>> agree and argue the lock in br_fdb_cleanup() and br_fdb_update() need a
>> fix too. I'll send a patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists