netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:35:54 -0800 (PST)
From:	terry white <twhite@...ota.com>
To:	joe@...ches.com
cc:	linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by
 pr_warn() in mppe_rekey()

... ciao:

: on "12-4-2014" "Joe Perches" writ:
: > Does it make sense to express such implementation details in the Linux 
: > coding style documentation more explicitly (besides the fact that this 
: > update suggestion was also triggered by a warning from the script 
: > "checkpatch.pl".
: 
: Probably not.
: 
: Overly formalized coding style rules are perhaps
: more of a barrier to entry than most want.

   funny you should mention that.  as nothing more than a casual observer, 
i'm noticing a "TIRED" sensation reading this thread.  i have "0" 
confidence a "SERIOUS" participant's enthusiasm would remain untested.

   however, the "checkpatch.pl" warning suggests an assumed 'custom'. i 
can't tell if this a 'serious' issue, or "pickin' fly shit out of pepper".

   but from my reading of it, the "CODE" , and the "logic" driving it, is 
not the problem.

    season's best ...

-- 
... it's not what you see ,
    but in stead , notice ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html