[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1412071140290.2044@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:44:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by
pr_warn() in mppe_rekey()
> A negative to that approach is inlined functions would
> take the function name of the parent not keep the
> inlined function name.
I tried the following:
#include <stdio.h>
inline int foo() {
printf("%s %x\n",__func__,0x12345);
}
int main () {
foo();
}
The assembly code generated for main is:
0000000000400470 <main>:
400470: b9 45 23 01 00 mov $0x12345,%ecx
400475: ba 4b 06 40 00 mov $0x40064b,%edx
40047a: be 44 06 40 00 mov $0x400644,%esi
40047f: bf 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edi
400484: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
400486: e9 d5 ff ff ff jmpq 400460 <__printf_chk@plt>
That is, the call to foo seems tom be inlined.
But the output is:
foo 12345
So it seems that __func__ is determined before inlining.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists