netdev - Re: is the commit 571dcfde2371 (net-next) a proper fix?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1418117110.17201.52.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:25:10 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	chenhc@...ote.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: is the commit 571dcfde2371 (net-next) a proper fix?

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 19:35 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > It seems for me that commit 571dcfde2371 (stmmac: platform: fix default
> > values of the filter bins setting) is redundant (moreover, it could be a
> > cause of crash in some cases when there is no platform data defined in
> > case of CONFIG_OF).
> > 
> > In case of no OF the platform data should be provided by platform code
> > where the defaults are set. What did I miss?
> 
> You missed follow-up fix:
> 
> commit 28603d13997e2ef47f18589cc9a44553aad49c86
> Author: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
> Date:   Thu Nov 27 21:05:34 2014 +0800
> 
>     stmmac: platform: Move plat_dat checking earlier

Thanks, now it makes sense, indeed.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html