[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548A14D0.7080605@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:04:00 -0800
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, peterz@...radead.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
mingo@...nel.org, mikey@...ling.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, matthew.vick@...el.com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
romieu@...zoreil.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com, will.deacon@....com, michael@...erman.id.au,
tony.luck@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] arch: Add lightweight memory barriers for coherent
memory access
On 12/11/2014 12:32 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:28:39 -0800
>
>> It occurs to me that I never got a sign off from any of the maintainers
>> on getting this pulled in.
>>
>> Since the merge window is open I was wondering which tree I should make
>> sure these patches apply to and who will be the one to pull them in?
>> Since I was modifying network drivers should I resubmit them for netdev,
>> or should I submit them for asm-generic or some other tree?
> I have no problem taking this via my tree, but I want to see agreement
> from other interested parties.
I'll resubmit them as a net-next submission after I verify that they
still apply cleanly and there aren't any build issues.
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists